data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d353/2d353fec17d2af2995775c0324393ae7e684c6f8" alt=""
I'm still experimenting with HDR processing of my photos and I thought I'd compare them side-by-side to see which I like better. The photo on the left of Safety Harbor Marina at sunset is HDR, while the one on the right was processed normally in PhotoShop.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d7e4/9d7e4ae7c383bc3706d0de56a450ae07abf9a092" alt=""
Both were from the same shot, both exposed in RAW format. The difference is with the HDR photo, I put the camera on a tripod and created 3 shots: 1 normal exposure, 1 underexposed by 2 stops and the other 1 overexposed by 2 stops. The normally processed photo was the middle shot with no over or under exposure.
I'm still trying to decide which way I prefer. I guess HDR has its place, maybe for architecture and interior work. I'll just have to keep playing with it until I can make up my mind.
Any comments?
If you like my work, and would like to see more of it, visit my website by clicking here.
Loyce